Publish with University of London Press
The University of London Press publishes books from the institutes of the School of Advanced Study. Each institute has its own criteria and policies. More information on publishing with us can be found at https://www.sas.ac.uk/publications/publish-with-us.
University of London Press books are peer reviewed, with a few exceptions, listed underneath the series information below. Different institutes and series have different peer review requirements, which are outlined on this page. For more information about any of these requirements, please contact the relevant institute.
In general, the peer review process works as follows. (Links to the peer review policies for individual series can be found under each institute heading.)
Proposals are considered by the relevant editorial board, director or head of publications for each institute. If the proposal is of interest, at least two reviewers are asked if they would be willing to report on it. For proposals, we ask that reports be returned within a month; for manuscripts, reviewers are asked to report within two to three months. However, it can take longer than this due to the need to find suitable and available reviewers, and the length of the submission. The review process can therefore take anything up to six months. Please feel free to contact the institute for updates if necessary.
The anonymised reports are sent to the authors or editors for their comments. If the reports are negative, or the institute decides not to contract the book, then the submission is declined for publication at this stage.
Authors/editors then make any necessary revisions to their work and resubmit a final manuscript, which is then assessed by the editorial board/director/head of publications of the relevant institute, who take the final decision on whether to publish the book. At this stage contracts are issued and the manuscript is passed to the University of London Press production team.
Institute of Advanced Legal Studies
Institute of Classical Studies
Human Rights Consortium
Institute of Historical Research
An initial assessment of the suitability of a proposal for the series will be carried out by the IHR’s editorial team, with further evaluation undertaken by the Publications Board. The most promising proposals will then be sent to external referees for peer review. The final decision about whether to recommend publication will be made by the Publications Board, in light of the referees’ reports.
It is highly unlikely that all papers delivered at a conference will be suitable for inclusion. It is, therefore, expected that editors will have exercised a degree of peer review before the submission of their proposal. Editors should have reviewed all the papers identified for inclusion in their volume and they should demonstrate the reason(s) for the selection of particular contributions over others.
This series is commissioned and edited by the Royal Historical Society. See here for information on the review process.
Institute of Latin American Studies
Information on peer review is available here
Exceptions to peer review
The following types of work are not peer reviewed:
Re-publications of previously published work (for example Women and the Law)